Коментари - Броят на загиналите при украински обстрел на пазар в Донецк нарасна до 25 души | Днес.dir.bg

Китайските власти призоваха във вторник за зачитане на суверенитета на всички страни с оглед референдума на Русия в четири региона на Украйна. „Китай винаги е поддържал, че суверенитетът и териториалната цялост на всички страни трябва да се уважава“, каза говорителят на външното министерство Уанг Уенбин на пресконференция в Пекин. Министърът на външните работи на Сърбия Никола Селакович заяви, че Белград не може да приеме резултатите от т.нар. референдуми в украинските области, контролирани от Русия, защото, както посочи, това би било „напълно против нашите държавни и национални интереси“ Министърът на външните работи на Иран Хосейн Амир Абдолахиан каза, че Техеран не е признал още анексирането от Русия на полуостров Крим в Черно море, въпреки близките си връзки с Кремъл, предаде ДПА.

Пак не си чел история - киевска рус (украйна) и московия (русия) са много различни неща.

Според НК и ръсенето на омраза по националност (като русофобията) в медийното пространство е престъпление! Член 162 от НК. А за НК онези на власт са за 5-15 години затвор за предателства - членове 98, 103, 105.

Хммм а ти откъде научи за бандера алеята на ангелите и другите гнусотии?

Русофибия казваш - а украинофобията какво я наричаш? Предателство значи хммм тук повечето пишещи копейки хлътват здраво.

Държава Украйна има от 1917г и до 1921г преди СССР. Понятието Украйна е от едва няколко века и то май покрай река Укра и от там укряни, укри и така нататък. Ленин им подарява Новорусия, а преди това не стигат Черно море.

Признати са от ООН!

Аз съм коментирал много, но не съм казал 1 дума обида украинците като цяло. Псувам си конкретно бандеровците фашисти! Които трябва да са най-мразените хора от нормалните украинците - те им докараха това! Но понеже си по принцип прав, затова на горният не съм кликнал плюс. Трябваше да е точен за бандеровц;ите, а не за всички украинци, а и не се казва така в пространството. Само че гледате само от едната страна.

това е фалшива новина! Украинските войски никога няма да нападат мирни цивилни граждани. Те са толкова човечни .

Аз не мисля че някой мрази народите като такива - било то руснаци, ураинци, американци и тн. Ако си такъв то значи си фашист. Обикновените хора не са виновни с нищо за една война предизвикана от откровен психопат намиращ се нейде на червения площад.

тая раша не може да се справи с Украйна ама иначе троловете и си представят планета от другари.

Прочети последният постинг тук (страница 2): https://www.researchgate.net/post/Havepoliticsinanywayaffectedyourcareeradvancementwhetherinresearchorineducation Има 34 литерарурни източника от главно Западнячи. Всичко е документирано. Прочети и тях. Хора, ходили и комуникира ли с донбасци, лиганци, и украинци както военни така и цивилни граждани.

Да конкретизирам за пуделите на евроатлантическата каишка - според материала "... през 2014 г. и оттогава е редовно обстрелван от украинската армия, припомня АФП." Господа без собствено мнение, тук става дума за гражданската война, която украинското правителство открито води срещу част от гражданите на Украйна. Казва го АФП!!!

In sketching events in Luhansk and Donetsk Republics; thus, highlighting Donbas area (BG: Oбласт; RUS: Oбласть,) dating, since 2014, it should be said that they rooted in ethical issues related to ethnic Russians and Ukrainians. In order to avoid misleading conclusion that the events deal only with armed conflict, one can concentrate on so-called forced Ukrainization process dating formally, since 1989. Briefly: Since, 1989 Ukrainian language has been recognized, but distinguishing between official language and state language. The Russian language has been classified as an interethnic communicational tool. In 1996 Ukrainian language becomes state language (Article 10) [1]. Thus, in 1999 the so-called official language and state language are the same, thus excluding from Russian language as a second official language. Due to these facts, the Russian language was equalised to languages of different ethnic minorities in Ukraine, including Bulgarian one, therein, despite, the fact that ethnic attachment for Russians differs throughout Ukraine territory (consider Table 1 in [2] or Figure 2 in [3]) as well as Russian ethnic minority in Ukraine is at about 22 % (2014) [3]. Furthermore, Russian language is spoken by at about 60 % of Ukrainian population, as a whole. Following this line of policy over period 1989–present, the treatment of Russian ethnic minority is characterised by underlined racialization. Available well-documented acts, even crimes in the latter context, cannot be classified as self-determination of Ukrainian nation according to International Law. Pro-arguments about the latter statement are derived from, for example: (i) Statement by Minister of Culture of Ukraine (Nyshchuk) dating since 2016 who has claimed that there is unable to Russian-speaking areas of Ukraine to perceive so-called Ukrainian culture, due to: “……lack of genetic purity.” [4]; (ii) There is professorship position at Interregional Academy of Personnel Management in Ukraine to American racist and neo-Nazi (Mr. D. Duke, 2004) who read courses in history and international relations at the latter institution [5], accounting for the fact that it is the largest private university in Ukraine. There are at about 57000 students at 24 regional campuses [5]. There are, as well as: (iii) Cases of racist crimes against ethnic Russians (consider war crimes in Donbas (2014) in Figure 8 [3]; (iv) Establishment of racialization in Ukrainian nation-building educational system, as highlighted, above [5]; and many more well documented examples of racistic neo-Nazi policy treating Russian minority in Ukrainian territory, including crimes. The racistic neo-Nazi policy, in fact, against Russians is classified as ethic cleaning or even genocide. Why? Debates on exact definitions of these terms and victimology of corresponding crimes include psychological, sociocultural, and political factors, as well as; not only act of killing, physically in crime of genocide [6]. At this point, it is plausible to say that ethnic Russian and Ukrainian are well distinguished not only on the base on linguistic criterion. The two ethic groups are classified frequently as nations, having dominating Slavic haplogroups [7] as Byelorussians and Bulgarians, among others. Consider map of Slavic countries in Europe where people have dominance of Slavic haplogroup R1a1 (Figure 2 [7], p. 113.) Common haplogroups of Bulgarian, Russian, Ukrainian, Byelorussian, and other Slavic ethnic groups can be found, herein [8]. Particularly illustrative is Figure 3(A) allowing the reader to assess the justification of statement about “……lack of genetic purity” of Russians by Mr. Nyshchuk [4]. However, from reference [9] we conclude further that there are genetics data on modern Russian people allowing us to distinguish their ethnic origin sharply on the base on a unique to them Finno-Ugric haplogroups originating from ancient Meryan people from Volga-Ural region. For instance, haplogroup N3a4 absent in Ukrainians and Byelorussians. Why it has needed to have said this? In order to underline explicitly that Russians are well-determined ethnic group people in context of so-called protected group used to define term genocide within the framework of International Law [10]. Therefore, Russian ethnic group is well distinguishable from Ukrainian one not only on linguistic criterion, but also on genetics one. In underlying ethnic groups in Ukraine, I would like to focus the reader’s attention on evolution of racistic neo-Nazi policy of Ukrainian government(s), as is highlighted by Mr. Nyshchuk’s statement [4]. Thus, it should be emphasised that it dates formally, since 1989. In fact, it can be traced far before 1989 mentioning following facts and arguments, as well. For instance, Ukrainian nationalist movement Rukh or Ukrainian People's Movement for Perestroika uses anti-Semitic slogans, despite, a rather lack of direct announcement of anti-Jewish discrimination [11]. Also, during Second World War in Ukraine, there has been established so-called Reichskommissariat Ukraine. It is regarded as Nazi Reich’s largest colony [12,13] aiming at establishing so-called Nazi-rules in Ukraine [11]. Reichskommissariat Ukraine exists until 03.1944, when the Red Army reached the Dnieper River [13]. Therefore, the Nazi ideology cannot be regarded as unaccustomed for Ukrainians over recent decades. Further: I should stress that policy of Nazi Reich includes annihilation not only to Jews, but also Roma, and Slavs [14]. For instance, during 1941–1945 there were killed 80000 prisoners in Serbia, who, however belong not only to Jewish or Roma ethnic groups, but also to Serbian one [14]. The so-called Lusatian Serbs also belong to Slavic nations [7]. Genocidal anti-Byelorussian acts and crimes were well-documented during 1946, as well [15]. They were conducted by Polish-Nazi collaborators [15]. Establishment of auxiliary formations or so-called Schutzformationen (GER) from ethnic groups from Ukraine, Baltic states, Belorussia, and more (including Bulgaria), who support Nazi security police forces was routine practice in Nazi Reich [16]. The genocide against ethnic Russians in Stalingrad and Leningrad during Second World War, I even should not tackle in this posting. The highlights are on common policy of Nazi Reich, during that time – annihilation of Jewish, Roma, and Slavs, as aforementioned, and how Nazi ideology can be found in the slogan and political acts in Ukrainian government(s) since 1989, including armed conflicts of Ukrainian military forces in Luhansk and Donetsk Republics during 2014–2022. Despite, Stalingrad’s ethnic groups in 1939 were: ethnic Russians (2003299 people) and ethnic Ukrainians (82509 people,) among others (see detail on Table 1, p. 31 [17].) In total, Stalingrad’s population during that time: 2288139 people; or there were 87.55 % ethnic Russians. In total, ethnic Ukrainian population – 3.61 %. In total, other ethnic minorities 8.84 % [17]. Importantly, according to Minsk Treaty, Luhansk and Donetsk (or Donbas area) areas are separated from the territory of Ukraine with the written agreement by Ukrainian government during that time. Consider point 6 in Minsk Treaty (01.09.2014, Minsk). It treats separated areas (RUS: ‘’отдельныx районax‘‘; GER: Bereiche; BG: Oбласти). Due to this fact they are recognized as Luhansk and Donetsk Republics (2014). In addition, there should be underlined the psychological and sociocultural negative affect on ethnic Russian in Ukraine, due to aforementioned rasistic policy of Ukrainian governments over decades. Particularly, talking about Second World War, it is well known and well documented that during 1941–1945 around 22 million Russian dead and at about 40 million people - wounded [18]. In total, during this most terrible war in human history at about 60 million people die, most of them were killed in mass campaigns of genocide and ethnic-cleansing [19]. Genocide over ethnic Russians during Second World War is well-documented, as well. The modern population of the latter two cities Stalingrad (currently Volgograd) and Leningrad (currently Saint Petersburg) represents at about 99-92% ethnic Russians, as well. Despite, there is population from at about 120 ethnic groups [20], but they are minorities. (Percent ethnics of overall modern population of Volgograd: Russians 88.89 % and Ukrainians 2.09 %, among others (see Table 2, page 96 [21].)) The latter statement means that crimes conducted by Ukrainian military forces in Russian territory such as killing of people including children in Belgorod as the most recent crime from well-documented series of crimes against Russian peoples, Russian cultural monuments, universities, air ports, infrastructure, hospitals, et cetera, et cetera are not war crimes, but genocide, due to reasons sketched above. Particularly, the latter case of crime in Belgorod includes killed civil ethnic Russians exceeding number four. Percent ethnics of overall modern population of Belgorod: Russians 92.88 % and Ukrainians 3.83 % among other (see Table 2, p. 97 [21].) The genetic variability among modern Russian, Ukrainian, and Belarusian is highlighted on Figure 4(B) (p. 381 [22]). (Work [20] discusses Russian and Bulgarian ethnic groups, among others, as well (see Table 3 [20].)) The etymology of the word genocide is a hybrid one. It is between Greek genos meaning family, tribe, or race as well as Latin suffix -cide or killing. Its exact meaning and translation into other languages remain controversial. The etymology of word genos refers to a common tribal origin or family clan (p. 12 [23].) It is associated with genetics (plural gene.) The term cultural genocide or Lemkin’s term genocide by assimilation is regarded as subcategory of ethnocide. The term latent genocide is by-product of armed conlict. For instance, bombing of civilian population in an armed conflict is an example of latent genocide (p. 41 [23].) The term race refers to share biological or genetic traits. The term ethnicity rooted rather in cultural factors; for instance nationality, culture, language, ancestry, and beliefs (pp. 10 and 21 [23].) Under term group (of people) in context definition of legal term genocide, there is understood collection of people who have a particular identity. It includes ethnic and racial identities, among others (see p.p. 44 and 46 [24].) (Detail on terms cultural genocide and policy-genocide or politicide in addition to interpretation of these terms as well as their applications to tribunals can be found [23,24].) Next, I attempt to concentrate the reader’s attention on common issues of regime in Argentina (1976-1983) and policy in Ukraine (2014-present); thus, providing additional pro-arguments about my statements written, so far. The regime in Argentina (1976-1983) has already been classified as terrorism and genocide by the International Criminal Court (ESMA Trial, p.77 [25]). It exhibits common issues with policy of Ukraine (2014–present.) The military servants who ruled Argentina (1976-1983) professed Nazi ideology. Their rules are defined as a continuation of Nazi genocide ideology of 1945, showing systematic prosecution and killing along with all other groups (people,) the Jewish community in Argentina, as well. The anti-Semitism, anticommunism, and so-called internal enemy, who is non-Argentine “Other” were key elements in regime-rules (p. 123 [26].) It is called Christianized fascism, as well (p. 154 [26].) For purposes of this posting, it is important to highlight that systematic ethnic anti-Russian policy in Ukraine sketched above is not only ethnic, but also theological one [23,26]. The anti-ethnic policy by Ukrainian government toward Russian ethnic minority is also connected with prosecution and banning of the Russian Orthodox Church. It happens not only in Luhansk and Donetsk Republics or Donbas area, but also in Ukraine. This violates human right to freedom of religion. It is clear enough. This violates the law protecting the property. The Church’s property is protected by law, as well as, even abroad. It is also clear enough. However, more important is analogy with regime of terror and genocide in Argentina. The so-called "Limiting the influence of a given community, so that they do not exert the so-called a pernicious influence on the majority of the masses” has been a central doctrine in Argentina during the discussed period. Precisely, the same wording or slogan is used (well documented and filmed) by current Ukraine government, classifying new rules against Russian Orthodox Church in Ukraine. The handwriting in doctrines in Argentina and that of government in Ukraine coincides in two points: Ethnicity and theology. In Ukraine there are ethnic anti-Russian acts of genocide and banning of Russian Orthodox Church. There can be found a literal translation of phraseology of Argentine Nazis stating "the mixture of Jews and Christians." Therefore, there were not only ideology ethnic-element, but also religious-one, governing their policy. An anti-Semitic arguments of Argentine terrorists, amongst others, were that Jews sought to preserve the purity of their ethnicity (ethnic-element.) As there is underlined above the two groups of people (Russian and Jewish) are well-determinable and unique using genetics criterion. Thus, both of them become subjects of genocide. The anti-Russian ethnic policy in Ukraine represents ethnic-element of doctrine of current Ukraine government. The same is true for the second element (theology one.) The major motivation behind banning of Russian Orthodox Church in Ukraine is argued with doctrine view that staff members of Russian Orthodox Church and Russian ethnic laymen are Russian intelligence agents (for example, see [https://tass.com/world/1544881], among many other sources) working against Ukrainians. The major doctrine view of Argentine regime includes that there were men and women close to the Catholic Church, therein, alongside nationalists, propelled anti-Semitism, giving it a legitimacy (p. 53 [26].) In other words, Ukrainian government describe staff members of Russian Orthodox Church in Ukraine as propelled anti-Ukrainism; thus, justifying banning of the Church. The ideological coincidence is obvious. It is the second theology element of the current Ukraine policy against the Russian Orthodox Church. Further: The process of so-called "national self-awareness of the majority population of Argentina" (p. 152 [23]) was main motivation behind rules of terrorist regime, therein, as well. The ultimate goal was to shape the thinking of society into direction: "West and Christianity" (p.162 [23].) In current Ukraine policy the latter includes only "West", however, singling out of Russian Christians and Russian Orthodox Church laity in Ukraine into a 'subversive' social group, even without their physical annihilation (yet!) As aforementioned, such policy is classified under International law as ethnocide, because of there is forcible transformation of identity of Russian ethnic population via cultural, including religious restrictions and banning. Next, common issue of the two policy regimes (Argentina/Ukraine) is that they were/are established by initially guerilla-type armed conflicts. There are eight years guerilla-type armed conflicts (2014–2022) in Luhansk and Donetsk Republics or Donbas area conducted by Ukrainian military forces. In both the cases (Argentina and Ukraine) such guerilla-type armed conflicts aimed at seizing power and society as a whole. The victims during reigime of terrorists in Argentina or so-called "national (domestic) genocide" (p. 132 [23]) generated under motto of protecting national security and national interests, as we hear from current Ukrainian government daily and repeatedly, numbered 30000 people (p. 77 [25].) Crimes conducted by Ukrainian military forces in Donbas in 2014: ‘….at least 10090 people, including 2777 civilians, have been killed and at least 23,966 injured.’ (p. 57 [27].) Other statistics relating to the same events: 13,000 people have been killed, among them 3300 civilians, and 1.6 million people displaced (p. 116 [28].) In 1989 only 32.5% of Donetsk‘s families are mono-ethically Ukrainians (p. 1086 [29].) Therefore, 67.5% are ethnic-Russian or mixed-ethic families, during that time. Therefore, these crimes are classified as genocide and ethic-cleaning against ethnic-Russians. In 2014 only 24.7 % of Ukrainian population feel themselves citizens of Ukraine (see Table 1, p. 595 [30].) In addition, sociological survey shows that at about 46% of Ukrainian population support for Russian language to be official state language in Ukraine in 2018 (p. 13 [31].) Importantly, the vote for Yanukovych’s impeachment (22.02.2014) shows that out of 328 deputies in Ukrainian Parliament 73% voted "yes"; thus, making 240 deputies. However, it is requested votes of 300 people (2/3 of 450 deputies of the Ukrainian Parliament) in order to make the impeachment process legitimate. Why I have used word event as an attempt to shed some light on all this, which happens in Luhansk and Donetsk Republics since 2022 instead of using terms related to armed affairs? There is limitation of using force by any Russian Authority, respectively, Institution both the Civilian or Military ones. If someone should ask: If these events are unable to be classified via terms related to military affairs, then, how they should be termed? The answer to such a question; if any is, rather: Defence, due to the following facts. The so-called International Movement of Donbas, dating from 1990 is against Orange Revolution, therein. It is regarded as precedent of Donbas separatism in 2014 (p. 46 [32].) The Donetsk Republic dates since 2005 (p. 58 [32].) Ukraine’s court made Donetsk Republic illegal in 2009 (p. 46 [32].) However, Donetsk Republic distributed passports of Donetsk Republic and declared independence of Donbas and Kherson from Ukraine. This raises permanent conflict between Ukrainian military forces and domestic anti-Ukrainian armed units, in addition to permanent ethnic anti-Russian policy from Ukrainian government(s) over these decades. In 2014 there is complain from people from Donetsk Republic before International Criminal Court against war crimes, torture, and more crimes conducted by perpetrators from Ukrainian military forces in territory of Donetsk Republic (p. 63 [32]). Complain has not been investigated by International Criminal Court. The two Minsk Treaties are trilateral ones among Ukraine, Russia, and Organization for Security, and Co-operation in Europe, and aiming at primarily withdrawing of illegal armed groups and military equipment, among others obligations, from Donetsk and Lugansk Republics. Instead of, after Minsk-I the conflict between Ukrainian military forces and domestic anti-Ukrainian armed forces deepened. (Due to latter reason, there is Minsk-II Treaty, which is similar, but not identical to Minsk-I one.) Under Minsk-II Treaty, Ukraine is obligated to provide (linguistic) self-determination of population in Donetsk and Lugansk Republics; also, participation of organs of local self-government, appointment of prosecution offices and courts in these areas, et cetera (p. 38 [32].) It includes agreement for state support of central government authorities of cross-border cooperation in the latter areas with districts of the Russian Federation. There is remark on Minsk Treaty that it should be signed by President of Ukraine or according to his order (Article 3; 1905-15.) It is signed by former President L. Kuchma as, I am citing, herein, ‘’private person’’ (p. 39, row 14 top-to- bottom [32].) Despite, Minsk I Treaty is endorsed by UN Security Council (Resolution 2022) as Minsk II one (17.02.2015) (see Resolutionen und Beschlüsse des Sicherheitsrats vom 1. August 2014 bis 31. Juli 2015; [https://www.un.org/depts/german/sr/sr_14-15/sr2202.pdf].) Importantly, first, Mr. L. Kuchma has Authorization; and, second, the Treaty is signed, highlighting ‘’Second President of Ukraine (L. Kuchma)’’. Consider page 2 of Minsk Treaty (01.09.2014). It is written RUS: ‘’Второй Президент Украины….‘. Therefore, the Treaty has not been signed by ‘’private person,’’ (p. 39, row 14 top-to- bottom [32]) but by authorized public person (Second President of Ukraine,) during that time. By dates, the events in 2014 in Donetsk and Lugansk Republics are as following: 06.04.2014: Anti-Ukrainian protesters from Donetsk Republic occupied security service headquarters in Donetsk and Luhansk areas. 12.04.2014: Armed unit from Donetsk Republic captured police and security service headquarters in Sloviansk and Kramatorsk. 02.05.2014: Street deaths of dozens pro-Russian activists in Odesa (p. 128 [32].) In total, 42 perished by fire in Odesa’s Trade-Union Building; 6 lost their lives in earlier clashes; and 208 - wounded [33]. 26.05.2014: Escalation formally starts end of May (Donetsk area) [32]. 12.06.2024: 51th, 72th, 24th, and 28th mechanized brigades; also, 79th airmobile brigades of Ukrainian army start establishment of control of border (p. 129 [32],) using heavy weapons (tanks, artillery, aviation, and more.) 05.05.2014: Ukrainian armed forces reestablished control over towns in Donetsk and Luhansk Republics (p. 129 [32].) Circa 15.07: 80th airmobile brigade, 24th brigade, battalion ‚Aidar‘, 1st tank brigade of Ukrainian armed forces started fighting on communication linking Luhansk with Russian border (p. 129 [32].) Heavy armed (Ukrainian) battalions and border guard units reinforced ca. 3000 fighters at about 150 km from Amvrosiivka and Izvaryne (p. 131 [32] (Izvaryne is Donetsk checkpoint with Russia.) 12.08.2014: Same Ukrainian military forces captured Vuhlehirsk near Debaltseve, put pressure on Horlivka garrison, captured Khriashchuvate (ca. 30 km from Russia’s border) and Novosvitlivka, respectively. 12-13.08.2014: Russian Federation provide military support for Donetsk and Lugansk Republics for self-determining of ethnic Russians, therein. The date is highlighted, explicitly, due to well-known accident with Malaysia MH17 airplane when 283 passengers die (17.07.2014,) as well. NB! Figure 1 of reference [3] claims about Ukrainian territory in 1654, however, Ukraine and Belorussia are annexed over a period of time 1601–1678 from Russia (see p.181 [34]). REFERENCES [1] [https://www.verfassungen.net/ua/verf96-i.htm]. [2] I. Bremmer, The politics of ethnicity: Russians in the new Ukraine. Europe-Asia Stud. 46 (1994) 261–283 [https://doi.org/10.1080/09668139408412161]. [3] V. Sotirovic, How the Kosovo case can influence a current Ukrainian crisis. J. Secur. Strud. Glob. Polit. 1 (2016) 1 – 8. [4] [http://ukranews.com/ua/news/461639-ministr-kultury-nyshhuk-zayavyv-pro-problemy-z-genetykoyu-u-zhyteliv-donbasu-ta-zaporizhzhya] (Accessed 23 Nov 2016.) [5] P. Rudling, Organized anti-semitism in contemporary Ukraine: Structure, influence and ideology. Canadian Slav. Pap. 48 (2006) 81–118 [https://doi.org/10.1080/00085006.2006.11092403]. [6] Y. Eski (Ed.), Genocide and victimology. Routledge Publisher, Taylor and Francis Group, New York (2022) pp. 1–234 (see Chapter 1.) [7] T. Kosinski, Archaeogeneticists on the origin of the Indo-Europeans, with particular emphasis on the pre-slavs as their oldest ancestors. Adv. Anthropol. 13 (2023) 111–151 [DOI:10.4236/aa.2023.132008]. [8] S. Karachanak, V. Grugni, S. Fornarino, D. Nesheva, N. Al-Zahery, V. Battaglia, V. Carossa, Y. Yordanov, A. Torroni, A. Galabov, D. Toncheva, O. Semino, Y-chromosome diversity in modern Bulgarians: New clues about their ancestry. PLOS ONE 8 (2013) e56779 [doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056779]. [9] M. Chukhryaeva, E. Pavlova, V. Napolskich, E. Garin, A. Klopov, S. Temnyatkin, V. Zaporozhchenko, A. Romanov, A. Agdzhoyan, O. Utevska, N. Markina, S. Koshel, O. Balanovsky, E. Balanovska, Is there a Finno-Ugric component in the gene pool of Russians from Yaroslavl oblast? Evidence from Y-chromosome. Russian J. Gen. 53 (2017) 388–399 [https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795417030048]. [10] P. Mysliwiec, Accomplice to genocide liability: The case for a purpose mens rea standard. Chicago J. Int. Law 10 (2009) article 16 [https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cjil/vol10/iss1/16]. [11] D. Little, Ukraine: The legacy of intolerance. Washington, United States Institute of Peace Press (1991), p. 22. [12] R. Gerwarth, S. Malinowski, Der Holocaust als "kolonialer Genozid"? Europäische Kolonialgewalt und nationalsozialistischer Vernichtungskrieg [The Holocaust as a "Colonial Genocide"? European colonial violence and the Nazi war of extermination). Gesch. Gesel. 33 (2007) 439–466. [13] K. Berkhoff, Harvest of despair: Life and death in Ukraine under Nazi Rule. Harvard Uni. Press, Cambridge, Harvard University Press. (2004) pp. 1–480. [14] P. Lisa. "Genocide in the former Yugoslavia." Debating Genocide, Bloomsbury Academic, London (2018) pp. 105–118 (chapter 6) [http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350035461.ch-006]. [15] M. Gudonis, B. Jones (E.) History in a Post-Truth World Theory and Praxis. Routledge Publisher, Taylor and Francis Group, New York (2022) pp. 1–330. [16] E. Westermann, Drunk on Genocide. Cornell Uni. Press, Ithaca and London (2021) pp. 1– 294 (see Chapter 6, p. 151) [https://doi.org/10.1515/hzhz-2023-1377]. [17] F. Taktasheva, Dynamics of ethic composition of the population of Stalingrad region in 1939–1959. J. Front. Res. 1 (2019) 29–42 (in RUS) [https://doi.org/10.24411/2500-0225-2019-10002]. [18] F. Clairmont, Hitler's nemesis, Econ. Polit. Week. 38 (2003) 2819–2823. [19] N. Faulkner, A people's history of the Russian revolution. Pluto Press (2017) pp. 1–304, (Chapter 11, p. 250) [https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/45628] [20] I. Morozova, O. Naumova, S. Rychkov, O. Zhukova, Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism in Russian population form five oblasts of the European part of Russia. Russian J. Gen. 41 (2005) 1040–1045 [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11177-005-0197-3]. [21] G. Golosov, The representation of ethnic Muslims in Russia’s regional legislative assemblies, J. Eurasian Stud. 3 (2012) 93–105 [doi:10.1016/j.euras.2012.03.001]. [22] P. Drineas, F. Tsetsos, A. Plantinga, I. Lazaridis, E. Yannaki, A. Razou, K. Kanaki, M. Michalodimitrakis, F. Perez-Jimenez, G. de Silvestro, M. Renda, J. Stamatoyannopoulos, K. Kidd, B. Browning, P. Paschou, G, Stamatoyannopoulos. Genetic history of the population of Crete, Ann. Hum. Genet. 83 (2019) 373–388. [23] D. Feierstein, Genocide as social practice: Reorganizing Society under the Nazis and Argentina's military juntas. Rutgers Uni. Press, New Jersey (2014) pp. 1–276 [https://doi.org/10.36019/9780813563190]. [24] L. May, Geocide, A normative account. Cambridge Uni. Press, Cambridge (2010) pp. 1–283 [https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807428]. [25] C. Federico, G. Hairabedian, The crime of Genocide: National and international theories and practices. The judgment of hierarchical responsible in genocidal processes. dialogues and comparative experiences: From International Criminal Court to Argentina ESMA Trial. J. Int. Crim. Law 4 (2023) 73–81 [Doi: 10.22034/JICL.2023.185347]. [26] F. Finchelstein, The ideological origins of the dirty war: Fascism, populism, and dictatorship in twentieth Century Argentina. Oxford Uni. Press, New York (2014) pp. 1–162 [https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199930241.001.0001] [27] M. Pertile, S. Faccio, Access to water in Donbass and Crimea: Attacks against water infrastructures and the blockade of the north Crimea canal. RECIEL. 29 (2020) 56–66 [DOI:10.1111/reel.12316]. [28] E. Dreyfus, J. Vilmer, A People-oriented peace formula for the Donbass. Washington Quart. 42 (2019) 115–132 [https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2019.1626689]. [29] P. Pirie, National identity and politics in southern and eastern Ukraine. Europe–Asia Stud. 48 (1996) 1079–1104 [https://doi.org/10.1080/09668139608412401]. [30] V. Kulyk, National identity in Ukraine: Impact of Euromaidan and the war. Europe–Asia Stud. 68 (2016) 588-608 [DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2016.1174980]. [31] O. Onuch, H. Hale, Capturing ethnicity: The case of Ukraine. Post-Soviet Aff. 34 (2018) 84–106 [https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2018.1452247]. [32] D. Marples, The war in Ukraine’s Donbas. Central European Uni. Press, Budapest, (2022) pp. 1–236 [https://ceupress.com/book/war-ukraines-donbas]. [33] H. Hale, O. Shevel, O. Onuch, Believing facts in the fog of war: Identity, media and hot cognition in Ukraine’s 2014 Odesa tragedy. Geopolitics 23 (2018) 851–881 [https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2018.1465044]. [34] R. Hellie, Russia and Belarus from Eastern Europe. Cambridge Uni. Press, Cambridge (2011) pp. 181–192 [https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781841.020].

Нещо да кажете за агресия и жестокост? Русия изстрелва двайсет мощни ракети по военни обекти в Киев - трима ранени. Усрайна стреля по пазар в Донецк - 25 убити. Е, кой е агресорът и животното в този двубой?

Пкп или Пеевски ще правят оценка по наказателния кодекс?

Това е гражданска война , организирана от Русия която иска Украйна да й играе по свирката. И при Янукович това се получаваше. Да, ама много украинци не искат да е така. Апропо и много руско говорящи украинци не го искат. Но Путьо си мисли че всичко му е позволено. Но дали ще му се получи. Тоя път може и да гризне дървото.

Нима? Искате ли да видите видеоклип с жертвите? Някои български ТВ медии показаха само развалините. В Донецк днес е обявен траур за загиналите, между които и деца. https://www.facebook.com/100088202243904/videos/1079626579952105

Това е гражданска война , организирана от Русия която иска Украйна да й играе по свирката. И при Янукович това се получаваше. Да, ама много украинци не искат да е така. Апропо и много руско говорящи украинци не го искат. Но Путьо си мисли че всичко му е позволено. Но дали ще му се получи. Тоя път може и да гризне дървото.

Кой бомбардира юни месец 2015г. кметството на Лугатск - Су 25 на ВВС на Украйна ли или руснаците? ВСУ започна операция не срещу въоръжени формирования, а срещу една час от собственото си население.

Това не е украинска територия!

Путьо...дърветата ги гризеш ти...а хохлите мрат... затова и почнаха кат хамас с тероризма...

Хе...американци убити няма!? Всичко е ОК значи...просто отличный результат! 500 хилки посраинцев не се броят - те не са хора...инфраструктурата че стана на дробсърма тоже... Англоамериканците си намериха безмозъчно зомби камикадзе и ще го използват докрай...докато сдохне... А иначе руските военни заводи си бачкат 24/7...дори увеличиха джепането в пъти... https://strana.today/news/455581-ssha-potratili-10-oboronnoho-bjudzheta-i-unichtozhili-50-vooruzhenija-rf-kemeron.html США потратили 10% своего оборонного бюджета, чтобы уничтожить 50% российского вооружения, не потеряв ни одного американца. Об этом министр иностранных дел Великобритании Дэвид Кэмерон заявил на украинском завтраке в Давосе, пишет The Guardian. "Американским коллегам я уже говорил: вы потратили 10% оборонного бюджета, что позволило уничтожить 50% российского вооружения без единой утраченной американской жизни. Это просто отличный результат!" — восхитился дипломат.

Путин не я започна, а бандеровците фашисти! Без тях война нямаше да има, нищо че управляващите САЩ гонят да постигнат войни по света. Крим обявява независимост още 1992г и е спорно от самото начало, трябва ли да е към Украйна, като са автономия със собствен парламент (Севастопол дори с руски войски и друг статут), а по-рано в СССР били Кримска автономна съветска социалистическа република, но ги подаря украинеца Хрушчов по случай 300 годишен съюз. Самият Путин е предупреждавал запада, че дойдат ли комунистите, веднага ще си го приберат. Като нищо ако Русия имаше друг президент, щеше още тогава да действа. Президент на Украйна издига психопата Бандера за национален герой 2010г. Преди в УССР/Украйна като са искали да обидят някой на изрод, са му викали Бандера. Като нищо ако Русия имаше друг президент, щеше още тогава да действа. При Майдана Русия предупреждаваше ли предупреждаваше, но никой не я слушаше. И подкрепиха бандеровците фашисти, само защото са срещу Русия. Едва ли на някой от тези "загрижени" за Украйна, изобщо му пука за Украйна и украинците. Те са просто срещу Русия и ги ползват. Като нищо ако Русия имаше друг президент, щеше да влезнат още 2014г ако не по-рано. Обвинявал съм Путин, че е прекалено мек. Даже преди някоя седмица каза нашите американски приятели. Трябва да бъдат научени да си мерят приказките и действията! Политиците им - да не обобщавам.

Тези като нищо са били украински граждани. И бъркаш причината и следствието. Първопричината са бандеровците фашисти!

Само ти не разбра че Русия и НАТО са във война вече две години

А после Украйна се оплаква като дърта курва на американските наркомани че бомбадират.

Бандеровците, ще им се сбъдне съкровенната мечта...ще се отидат при бандера))

Бандера лапа на сащ и сащ лапа на бандера)

Бандеровският рай приема безплатно)

Абе Путин,давай наред като Нетаняху

Е като трепеш собствените си граждани как после ще искаш да си върнеш територията с населението което ги мрази.

Руснаците говорят за нашите хора, украинците за нашите земи.

Пишеш простотии, загиналите са цивилни граждани, те не са виновни за престъпленията на Путин.

Още по голямо квичене на проруските пачаври ще стане когато украинцте почнат да трепят наред и по руска територия!!! Дай боже по-скоро !!!!

Добре тогава, Стреснах се.... Само да те попитам европедалчо стефчо: Ти за самоубийство мислил ли си? Само питам......А мамито ти.... ? Пак само питам! И не отговаряй

Загиналите цивилни граждани вече са 27. ООН за удара по Донецк: Атаките срещу цивилни трябва да спрат незабавно ООН, 21 януари - Нападенията срещу цивилни и гражданска инфраструктура са нарушение на международното хуманитарно право и трябва да бъдат прекратени незабавно, се казва в коментара на официалния представител на генералния секретар на ООН във връзка с обстрела на Донецк от украинските въоръжени сили. " „Атаките срещу цивилни и гражданска инфраструктура са забранени от международното хуманитарно право, неприемливи са и трябва да спрат незабавно“, се казва в коментара.

Така е при война, но това орките го знаят.

Ако толкова искаш война, отивай да се биеш в Украйна, и без това набират доброволци без опит. Ше имаш шанса да убиваш когото си поискаш.

сладък, ако НАТО влезне във война с Раша ти първи ще избягаш ха х ах

това го правят в Донбас още от майдана 2014г. Затова руснаците започнаха СВО.. А Крим НИКОГА няма да бъде американска военна база, Затова руснаците си го взеха

той е смел само пред компа или като дръпне едно бело като идола си зелениянаркоманизиранминдил

Дали убийството на цивилни е тероризъм или геройство? Зависи от чия страна. Това е високият морал на радетелите за свобода и справедливост.

Почти я разрушиха фашистите на путкин. Но какво става в газъ, ето как създават декора хамас за да се изкарат мъченици на алах https://youtube.com/shorts/i9qA552X0hA?si=8Iz1GQiSGDE-wigI

Странно какви военни цели са искали да поразят на пазара.

Най- близки хора да водят война ! Или по - скоро са използвани за това.

Всеки ден така! Бомби от двете страни докато тая п..а...с..м..и..на. руска и украинска не се самоизтреби !

И защо никъде не споменавате, че укро-фашистите са избили само невинни граждани? Че това е чист тероризъм? Че бандеровщината посяга единствено на цивилни в населените места и само там има успех? На фронта ги трепат като мухи-лайнарки.

Ти нормален ли си ?

Полицейските профсъюзни синдикати в Италия бият тревога: за последните 13 месеца рязко и необяснимо са нараснали случаите на внезапна смърт при млади италиански полицаи на възраст 29-40 години. Всички починали полицаи са били ваксинирани с COVID-ваксините на Бил Гейтс. Нарастването на смъртността е близо 200% сравнено с предходни години преди 2019-2020 година: https://peterhalligan.substack.com/cp/140880354#details Тези от вас, които не говорят английски да ползват Google Translate, за да прочетат статията. В същото време в днешна Русия хората имащи собствени жилища са 89%. В България този процент е 85%. Като цяло в топ 20 на държавите, където населението има собствени имоти и не живее под наем са все бивши социалистически държави. На първо място е Лаос с 95.9% собственост върху жилищата, а на второ място е Румъния с лошия диктатор Николае Чаушеску, където собствениците на жилища са 95.3%. Колективният Запад решително изостава в тази световна класация. На Запад, включително и в САЩ, собствениците на жилища са между 30 и 50%. В Германия този процент е едва 48-49%. Това означава, че половината германци са бедняци без никаква собственост и цял живот живеят под наем, а като остареят с пенсийката отиват в най-близкия евтин старчески дом, където да карат своите старини. Това обаче при условие, че достигнат годините и възрастта за пенсия, ако междувременно не са предали Богу дух или не са били уволнени или изгонени от работа преди да се пенсионират. Ето как хубаво и прекрасно се живее в капиталистическия рай на колективния Запад, както се опитват да ни внушат евтините и малоумни козяшко-соросоидни тролове в България, които са на ръчно управление от американското посолство в София и от фондациите "Америка за(д) България" и "Отровено общество" на сатаниста-глобалист Джордж Сорос! Ето и класацията за процентите собственост върху жилищата в цял свят: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Listofcountriesbyhomeownershiprate